Todos los drivers que necesites de Tarjetas de vdeo para descargar al instante con nuestro sistema de descarga directa. Ayuda tcnica gratuita para usuarios. How to increase fps in PC games Want your games to run faster, with more frames per second Try these tips and tricks to increase your fps before shelling out on a. M Pavlov said. Hi and thanks for your great work Since Uninstall is not supported can the Intel GMA 4500 Series Feature Pack be removed by just deleting. Blender Render Benchmark v0. Hello Blender users and computer enthusiasts out there, I am very sad to announce that the Blender render benchmark is closed for an. Intel GMA X3. 10. Graphics Performance Review. The performance of Intels GMA X3. Post navigation Previous Next Installing Nvidia Mobile GPU Display Driver on Laptops Upgraded to Windows 10, 8. Using Modded INF. And why shouldnt people be curious The GMA X3. If youre buying Intel, odds are pretty good youre buying a GMA X3. When I went to the Game Developers Conference in February of 2. I was pleasantly surprised by what appeared to be a renewed interest in gaming from Intel. They were very excited by their GMA X3. X3. 10. 0 is a part of, and why wouldnt they beHeres the first graphics core theyve made thats actually designed to do something other than put an image on your screen or run Aero Glass. They demonstrated a real desire to make their integrated graphics competitive with the parts from ATI and n. Vidia, and to raise the bar for gaming developers so that the lowest common denominator they had to code for would be a good one. They even took me behind closed doors and demonstrated their IGP running Half Life 2 Episode One at medium settings at 1. So GDC has come and gone, about ten months have passed and several new drivers for the GMA X3. The question becomes has Intel made good on their promise TEST SETUPTo test the Intel GMA X3. Im using the HP dv. GB of RAM. Specifications are as follows Intel Core 2 Duo T5. GHz, 6. 67 MHz FSB2. GB DDR2 6. 67. Intel GMA X3. Download/Photo/sbc84831_3.jpg' alt='Drivers Intel Gma 950 Windows 8' title='Drivers Intel Gma 950 Windows 8' />GB 5. Hitachi SATA Hard Disk. DVD RAM w Lightscribe. Intel Wireless 3. ABG w Bluetooth. Windows Vista Home Premium 3. The processor is one of the low men on Intels totem pole right now, but is nearly as common as the GMA X3. Its become a very popular baseline part, and thats understandable even at 1. GHz, systemwide performance is formidable as I demonstrated in my last article where I pit it against a Turion 6. X2 clocked at 1. 9. GHz. The GMA X3. 10. It is presently the only IGP to use the unified shaders specified by Microsoft for Direct. X 1. 0 support, featuring 8 scalar shading units that can process video, vertex, and texture operations. Its also the first part from Intel that supports texture and lighting in hardware. While it doesnt feature its own memory, it can address up to 3. MB of system RAM for video memory, and it addresses the amount of RAM it uses dynamically to ensure maximum performance. Presently, Intels most recent driver enables hardware vertex shader processing, though this can be switched to software using a really roundabout and frankly tedious and over involved method. The drivers for this hardware have been under constant updating and improvement over the past ten months, so were going to see what these improvements have yielded. As a sidenote, Im handling this review a little bit differently than my last two IGP reviews. Here, Im going to focus a bit more on the hard numbers I was able to glean out of this hardware, so feedback on whether you like this approach better or worse than my previous approach is appreciated. Part of the reason Ive chosen to do this is because, frankly, theres a lot of conflicting information on the forums about the performance of the GMA X3. I wanted to be able to just deliver straight facts. DOOM 3 v. 1. 3. If youve been reading me for a while, youre probably aware Doom 3 is one of my favorite whipping boys for graphics hardware benchmarks. Years after the fact, the very scalable no, really, Ive run it very playably on a Radeon 8. DV Doom 3 can still offer a decent amount of punishment for hardware thats not ready for it. At the same time, a lot of technology it uses has since become the norm stencil shadows, heavy bump mapping, specular lighting. For Doom 3, switching between software and hardware vertex shader processing yielded no difference in performance, which I find particularly interesting since anecdotally, its been my theory that the reason n. Vidias IGPs always murder ATIs even the recent X1. ATI doesnt include a hardware vertex shader like n. Vidia does. All benchmarks were run with the game set to 6. Low Quality. As the game was completely unplayable with everything enabled, I toggled options to see how it would perform. Shadows. 11. 5wo Specular Lighting. Shadows and Specular Lighting 1. The game is unplayable. At certain points during the demo it ran smoothly, but the instant the environment got even the slightest bit complex, the framerate took a heinous nosedive. Given the reputed lousy Direct. X 8 performance of the GMA X3. UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2. My other favorite whipping boy, I employed u. Mark to run several benchmarks on this classic. If you cant play Unreal Tournament 3, this is always available for dirt cheap. If you canwell, youre probably still better off buying this. I used u. Mark to benchmark the game in the Icetomb and Inferno maps with 7 bots enabled. Ive found these to be two of the most demanding maps in the game. Benchmarks were run with all settings at Normal, all checkboxes checked, and shadows set at blob. Benchmarks labeled HS were run with all settings at their highest level, to the point where the games announcer actually says holy s when you set the last one. Note this isnt a joke, as most of UT2k. Resolution. Icetomb FPSIcetomb Min. FPSInferno FPSInferno Min. FPS6. 40 x 4. 80. HS 3. 11. 13. 78. HS 3. 01. 13. 56. HS 2. 46. 27. 5As you can see, the GMA X3. UT2. 00. 4, delivering solid performance all the way up to 1. This is a massive improvement from the GMA 9. I played with one. So bad was that chips performance that the game actually ran better and smoother under the software renderer. Unfortunately, this isnt all bread and roses. While the GMA X3. UT2. 00. 4, the framerate is erratic. Its playable, but its not smooth. I dont expect miracles out of integrated hardware, but after reviewing n. Vidias 7. 15. 0M and the Go 6. Ive come to know what to expect from graphics hardware. The high highs and LOW lows of the X3. FAR CRY v. 1. 4. Far Cry is one of my favorites for benchmarking, but the flipside is that even though technically the game scales well, the visual difference is always painfully pronounced. At low settings, Far Cry can be pretty depressing to look at, and youll sit there wondering where all the foliage went. For benching Far Cry, I used Hardware. OCs Far Cry benchmark v. Ubisofts stressful Volcano demo. The benchmark program has three settings for image quality, Minimum and Maximum. While clearly there isnt a lot of granularity here, it should suffice. Resolution. Result FPS6. Min. 51. 7. 16. 404. Max. 23. 5. 68. 006. 3D Super Full Crack Internet on this page. Min. 50. 6. 78. 006. Max. 21. 0. 11. 02. Min. 46. 6. 31. 02. Max. 17. 0. 7Far Cry carves out another win for the GMA X3. All told this thing should run Far Cry at 1. This is probably the biggest win Ive seen for an IGP, so at least here were seeing the X3. Far Cry fans will be very happy with the X3. F. E. A. R. v. 1. F. E. A. R. is another game that scales surprisingly well and is easy to test. First, an amusing anecdote running the game with the graphics card set at Minimum actually results in WORSE performance than running it with the graphics card set at Low. This can very likely be attributed to using Direct. X 8 shaders instead of Direct. X 9s, which the GMA X3. With the computer and graphics card set at Low, I achieved the following numbers Resolution. Avg FPSMin FPSMax FPS6. Below 1. 02. 47. X3. VERY well and unlike in other games, actually produced fairly smooth framerates. Ive watched this benchmark a thousand times, and on the X3. Dell Latitude Wikipedia. Latitude E5. 57. 0 with its back cover open. Latitude is Dells business laptop brand, designed and manufactured mainly by Compal and Quanta. The Latitude competes with the Think. Pad series from Lenovo formerly IBM Think. Pad series, the Elite. Book series from HP and Travelmate series from Acer. Overview and product typeeditThe Dell Latitude is a laptop family from Dell Computers, intended for business use. By contrast, the Dell Inspiron is aimed at the consumer market and its specifications change regularly. Whereas Inspiron may change vendors or components several times over the course of a single model, the Latitude line generally retains identical components throughout its production. This design is intended to simplify maintenance and support tasks for large corporations, allowing components to be easily swapped between models. The lines of Dell Latitude personal computers are currently in the E series, which is the successor to the popular Latitude D, C, and X series. The Latitudes from the early 1. C0. 0 lines werent in a set series, instead going under the models CP and XP with modifiers at the end, e. XPi, CP M2. 33. In the past, the mainstream line was the 6 series, being the C6x. D6x. 0, and E6. 4x. The 1. 5 Premium line was the 8 series, until the E series merged this line with the 6 series Model numbers being along the lines of C8x. D8x. 0. The budget line was the 5 series, but as of 2. Latitude laptops are the primary lines of Latitude laptops. The 3 series has replaced the 5 series as the budget line. Dell has also since dropped the E from the Latitude line, and the models just go by number now, e. Latitude 5. 48. 0, 5. The second number in the model As in, 5. The current Dell Latitude lineup is as follows Latitude 3xxx series. Budget models intended for education or home office environments, available in 1. Latitude 5xxx series. Mainstream line,available in 1. Latitude 7xxx series. Premium ultrabooks, available in 1. Latitude computers are also differentiated in their feature sets, due to their business focus. For example, they often include security features such as smartcard and contactless smartcard, and TPM security, which are not needed by most consumers. A lid clasp as opposed to a magnetic latching system, Display. Port video out as opposed to HDMI, and support for legacy standards are all results of the requirements of the business market. Some models also have the capability of Latitude ON which can be selected during the configuration of the laptop. Latitude ON is essentially a system within a system. It requires a separate add on module which contains its own microprocessor and Operating system. This allows the laptop to function in the realm of a Netbook. The primary competitors to the Latitude series are the Lenovo Thinkpad line and the HP Elitebook line, both of which offer similar business oriented features and durability of the Latitude line. Current modelsedit. RFID Optional location on a Latitude E6. Dell used the E series name up through the 2. E. 12 As of February 2. Latitude computers are available in three series the 3. The 3. 00. 0 series is designed to be entry level, similar to the previous Latitude E5. Latitude E5. 4xx laptops. The 5. 00. 0 series is mid range, similar to the Latitude E6. E6. 5xx. The 7. 00. Ultrabook computers, introduced in 2. Latitude E7. 44. 0 and E7. Aside from the 3. Dell also provides an Education and Rugged Series of Latitude computers. The Education series laptops are designed for use in educational institutions. Theyre not especially powerful, and are more geared towards office applications or internet based applications. The Rugged series laptops are similar to the previous Latitude XFR computers. They are designed with extra durability in mind. Models 2. 01. 7edit7. Ultraportable 7th gen Core i. Ultraportable 7th gen Core i. Mainstream 7th gen Core i. Mainstream 7th gen Core i. Mainstream 7th gen Core i. Ultraportable 2 in 1 7th gen Core i. Essential 7th gen CeleronCore i. Essential 7th gen CeleronCore i. Essential 7th gen CeleronCore i. Essential 2 in 1 7th gen Core i. Previous ModelseditExx. Models 2. 00. 82. E6. 50. 0 1. 5. 4 Mainstream Core. DuoE6. 40. 0 1. Mainstream Core. DuoE6. 40. 0 ATG 1. Semi Rugged Core. DuoE6. 40. 0 XFR 1. Fully Rugged Core. DuoE5. 50. 0 1. Essential CeleronCore. DuoE5. 40. 0 1. Essential Core. DuoE4. Ultraportable Core. DuoE4. 20. 0 1. Ultraportable Core. DuoExx. 10 Models 2. E6. 51. 0 1. 5. 6 Mainstream 1st gen Core i. E6. 41. 0 1. 4. 1 Mainstream 1st gen Core i. E6. 41. 0 ATG 1. Semi Rugged 1st gen Core i. E5. 51. 0 1. 5. 6 Essential 1st gen Core i. E5. 41. 0 1. 4. 1 Essential 1st gen Core i. E4. 31. 0 1. 3. 3 Ultraportable 1st gen Core i. Exx. 20 Models 2. E6. 52. 0 1. 5. 6 Mainstream 2nd gen Core i. E6. 42. 0 1. 4. 0 Mainstream 2nd gen Core i. E6. 32. 0 1. 3. 3 Ultraportable 2nd gen Core i. E6. 22. 0 1. 2. 5 Ultraportable 2nd gen Core i. E5. 52. 0 1. 5. 6 Essential 2nd gen Core i. E5. 42. 0 1. 4. 0 Essential 2nd gen Core i. E5. 52. 0m 1. 5. Value CeleronCore. DuoE5. 42. 0m 1. Value CeleronCore. DuoE6. 42. 0 XFR 1. Fully Rugged 2nd gen Core i. E6. 42. 0 ATG 1. Semi Rugged 2nd gen Core i. Exx. 30 Models 2. E6. 53. 0 1. 5. 6 Mainstream 3rd gen Core i. E6. 43. 0 1. 4. 0 Mainstream 3rd gen Core i. E6. 33. 0 1. 3. 3 Mainstream 3rd gen Core i. E6. 23. 0 1. 2. 5 Mainstream 3rd gen Core i. E5. 53. 0 1. 5. 6 Essential 3rd gen Core i. E5. 43. 0 1. 4. 0 Essential 3rd gen Core i. Ultraportable 3rd gen Core i. Exx. 40 Models 2. E6. 54. 0 1. 5. 6 Mainstream 4th gen Core i. MobileE6. 44. 0 1. Mainstream 4th gen Core i. MobileE7. 44. 0 1. Ultraportable 4th gen Core i. ULVE7. 24. 0 1. Ultraportable 4th gen Core i. ULVE5. 54. 0 1. Mainstream 4th gen Core i. ULVE5. 44. 0 1. Mainstream 4th gen Core i. ULVE3. 54. 0 1. Essential 4th gen Core i. ULVE3. 44. 0 1. Essential 4th gen Core i. ULVExx. 50 Models 2. E7. 45. 0 1. 4. 0 Ultraportable 5th gen Core i. E7. 35. 0 1. 3. 3 Ultraportable 5th gen Core ME7. Ultraportable 5th gen Core i. E5. 55. 0 1. 5. 6 Mainstream 5th gen Core i. E5. 45. 0 1. 4. 0 Mainstream 5th gen Core i. E5. 25. 0 1. 2. 5 Mainstream 5th gen CeleronCore i. E3. 55. 0 1. 5. 6 Essential 5th gen CeleronCore i. E3. 45. 0 1. 4. 0 Essential 5th gen CeleronCore i. Exx. 70 Models 2. E7. 47. 0 1. 4. 0 Ultraportable 6th gen Core i. E7. 27. 0 1. 2. 5 Ultraportable 6th gen Core i. Ultraportable 6th gen Core m. Ultraportable 2 in 1 6th gen Core m. E5. 57. 0 1. 5. 6 Mainstream 6th gen Core i. E5. 47. 0 1. 4. 0 Mainstream 6th gen Core i. E5. 27. 0 1. 2. 5 Mainstream 6th gen Core i. Ultraportable 2 in 1 6th gen Core m. Essential 6th gen CeleronCore i. Essential 6th gen CeleronCore i. Other ModelseditXT3 1. Convertible Touch Tablet Pen Core i. XT2 1. 2. 1 Convertible Touch Tablet Pen Core. Duo ULVXT2 XFR 1. Convertible Touch Tablet Pen Fully Rugged Core. Duo ULV2. 10. 0 1. Netbook. 21. 10 1. Netbook. 21. 20 1. Netbook. Z 1. 6. 0 Thin and Light. The previous series is the Latitude D series, on the Dx. The models are the D4x. Ultra Mobile, D5x. D5. 31, plastic case, value model, D6x. Corporate model and D8x. Intel Core 2 Duo and the Intel Santa Rosa chipset, with the exception being the D5. Ever since the D4. D6. 20, and D8. 00, the D series features wide aspect LCD screens 1. Latitude D6x. 0 serieseditThe Latitude D6x.